Malik Nabers questionable, Drew Lock, Tyrone Tracy are expected to play

Giants star receiver Malik Nabers was able to get back on the field for Friday’s practice and has a chance to play in Sunday’s matchup against the Colts.

Nabers (toe) was listed as a non-participant on Wednesday and Thursday’s injury reports, but was limited on Friday. Nabers is officially questionable for Week 17.

Via multiple reporters, head coach Brian Daboll said in his Friday press conference that he’s “hopeful” Nabers will be able to play.

Quarterback Drew Lock (right shoulder) was upgraded to a full participant after he was limited on Wednesday and Thursday’s reports. He’s off the report and is set to start, as expected.

Running back Tyrone Tracy (ankle) was also listed as DNP for Wednesday and Thursday before being limited on Friday. He has no game status and is expected to play.

Nabers has caught 97 passes for 969 yards with four touchdowns in 13 games this season. Tracy has rushed for 721 yards with five TDs and caught 34 passes for 263 yards with one touchdown.

Defensive tackle Armon Watts (shoulder), offensive lineman Austin Schlottmann (fibula), and cornerback Dee Williams (toe) are questionable.

Safety Raheem Layne (knee), linebacker Micah McFadden (neck), center John Michael Schmitz (ankle), and cornerback Greg Stroman (shoulder/shin) are all out.

Safety Dane Belton (knee), offensive lineman Jermaine Eluemunor (wrist), cornerback Andre Phillips (knee), defensive lineman Jordan Riley (knee), offensive lineman Aaron Stinnie (concussion), and guard Greg Van Rosen (knee) are all off the report and are expected to play.


Source link : https://sports.yahoo.com/malik-nabers-questionable-drew-lock-193724676.html

Author : ProFootball Talk on NBC Sports

Publish date : 2024-12-27 19:37:00

Copyright for syndicated content belongs to the linked Source.

Check Also

Broncos vs. Bengals where to watch: How to watch, stream, prediction for pivotal AFC showdown

Saturday’s showdown between the Bengals and Broncos will feel like a playoff game because, in …